CHDS

The new studies suggest that framing possible storm damages in the non-linearly increasing multiples of damages produced relative to a minimal hurricane may increase compliance with evacuation orders.

Study: Gulf Coast residents underestimate hurricane destructiveness

Hurricane destructiveness increases non-linearly with increases in storm intensity. New research by UGA weather and climate psychologist Alan Stewart suggests that people are not aware of this relationship but if they were, they would evacuate more quickly.

Michael Childs | September 19th, 2011  |  Published in CHDS, Features

Alan Stewart is an associate professsor in the College of Education's department of counseling and human development services.

Three new studies led by University Georgia weather and climate psychologist Alan Stewart suggest that people living near the United States’ Gulf Coast may systemically underestimate the damages that some hurricanes can produce when landfall occurs.

However, if people are given additional information on the destructive potential of certain hurricanes, they would be more likely to evacuate compared to those who were given the hurricane category alone, said Stewart, an associate professor in the College of Education’s department of counseling and human development services.

As the intensity of a hurricane increases on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale (SSHS), previous studies have documented that economic damages tend to increase exponentially.

“Hurricane destructiveness increases nonlinearly with increases in storm intensity. Our studies suggest that people are not aware of this relationship,” he said.

In two studies, one of which involved university students and the second of which involved a random sample of people residing in counties along the U.S. Gulf Coast, a majority of people in each sample indicated that damages increased in a straight-line manner and thus underestimated the degree of damage that could occur. The magnitude of coastal residents’ damage underestimations ranged from a factor of approximately 2 for a Category 2 hurricane to a factor of about 15 for a Category 5 hurricane.

A third study involving Gulf Coast residents found that especially for hurricanes of Categories 2 or 3, people provided with the exponentially-increasing damage estimates were more likely to report that they would evacuate compared to people those who were given the hurricane category alone.  The study concluded that the public would benefit from additional education about the ways that the destructive potential of hurricanes increases exponentially as their Saffir-Simpson intensity increases.

Studies 1 and 2 suggest that the public needs to learn more about the nonlinear relationship between hurricane intensity and the corresponding damages that may result. Study 3 suggests that framing possible storm damages in the non-linearly increasing multiples of damages produced relative to a minimal hurricane may increase compliance with evacuation orders.

The three studies, appeared in the most recent issue of the journal, Weather, Climate and Society, which is published quarterly by the American Meteorological Society.

 Stewart recommended that people examine the website of the National Hurricane Center  to gain a better understanding of the nature and magnitude of hurricane impacts associated with each Saffir-Simpson category.


Michael Childs is Director of Public Information for the UGA College of Education.

Comments are closed.