Dr. Thomas C. Reeves is professor of instructional technology at
The University of Georgia where he teaches program evaluation,
multimedia design, and research courses. He recently coauthored a book
with Dr. John Hedberg titled “Interactive Learning Systems Evaluation.”
I conducted an online interview with Dr. Reeves about this book.Farhad Saba, Ph. D.
CEO, Distance-Educator.com
Dr. Saba: What prompted you to write a book about evaluation?
Dr. Reeves:
While I was in the Ph.D. program in the Area of Instructional
Technology at Syracuse University back in the 1970s, I was very
fortunate to study evaluation with Dr. Edward F. Kelly, who was the
Director of Evaluation for the Center for Instructional Development
(CID) at that time. As my mentor and dissertation advisor, Dr. Kelly
helped me develop a passion for evaluation, a topic that still seems to
turn most people off. He was a wonderful teacher and role model, and I
owe him far more than I can ever express.
After completing my
Ph.D. in 1979, I undertook several consultancies and short term jobs as
an evaluator at places such as the New York State of Mental Health and
the University of Maryland University College before joining the
faculty at The University of Georgia (UGA) in 1982. During those years,
I started collecting “war stories” from the evaluation “trenches,” and
later I began to share those stories at evaluation workshops at various
professional conferences.
In the early 1990s, I was very
fortunate to start doing some work in Australia where I reestablished
contact with Professor John Hedberg, with whom I had gone to graduate
school at Syracuse University. John had established an excellent
reputation as a multimedia designer and evaluator “down under” and
elsewhere. Soon, we began to offer workshops together, and in the
process, developed quite an elaborate set of evaluation tools,
templates, guidelines, and so forth. At the same time, both John and I
were teaching graduate courses in evaluation at our respective
institutions, the University of Wollongong and UGA. We shared our
frustration that there was no book available that adequately captured
the nature of the evaluation process within the context of
instructional design and technology. Meanwhile, our students, workshop
attendees, and others were telling us, “Why don’t you write an
evaluation book?”
We actually began writing early drafts of the
book in 1993, ten years before it was published, but we didn’t get
heavily engaged in it until about four years ago. As we wrote the book,
we tested iterations with classes of graduate students in Australia and
the USA, and over time, we hope that we have honed it into a worthwhile
volume. The testimonials we have received from reviewers such as Alison
Rossett from San Diego State, Stanley Varnhagen from the University of
Alberta, Carmel McNaught from the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ron
Oliver from Edith Cowan University, Joe Henderson from Dartmouth
Medical School, and Curt Bonk from Indiana University have been very
encouraging.
Dr. Saba: You collaborated with Dr. Hedberg in writing this book. Did this collaboration take place primarily online?
Dr. Reeves:
In the early days, we wrote pieces separately, and edited them together
whenever I would visit Australia or John would visit the States. I have
made about ten trips “down under” since 1990, and John comes to North
America at least once a year. But during the last two years of writing,
we collaborated online for the most part, sending chapter versions back
and forth. This introduced some interesting challenges, involving the
differences in document formats (A4 versus US Letter) and spelling
checkers (“organise” versus “organize”). We wrote everything on Apple Macintosh computers, wonderful machines for this type of collaborative work.
We
had so much invaluable help along the way. Dr. Jan Herrington, formerly
at Edith Cowan University, and now at the University of Wollongong,
helped a tremendous amount with formatting as well as content. My
wonderful wife, Dr. Trisha Reeves, carried the lion’s share of the
proofreading. She has a keen eye for detail like no other. Additional
colleagues who helped included Bill Aggen, Shirley Alexander, Christine
Brown, Kent Gustafson, Barry Harper, Joe Henderson, Jim King, Geraldine
Lefoe, Mary Marlino, Carmel McNaught, Mary L. Miller, Mary R. Miller,
Jim Okey, Ron Oliver, Geoff Ring, Murray Tillman, and Stanley
Varnhagen. I am sure I am forgetting several important contributors. Of
course, we were helped enormously by our graduate students and workshop
attendees who compelled us to write this book in the first place and
who provided us with invaluable feedback along the way.
Dr. Saba: who is the primary audience for the book?
Dr. Reeves: John
and I share a belief that evaluation activities are critical to the
effective development of interactive learning systems such as
e-learning and other online learning approaches. We believe that
evaluation is often overlooked or shortchanged in the haste to generate
interactive products and programs and deliver them on time. The few
evaluations that are done are rarely reported in time to influence
critical decisions about design, production, and implementation issues.
We think that evaluation should guide the creative development process
by providing timely and insightful feedback about e-learning designs
and the quality of their implementation.
The book is structured
around a model of six facets of evaluation linked to specific stages in
the design and development of interactive educational products such as
multimedia DVD’s, Web-based training, electronic performance support
systems, and e-learning solutions. We have sought to link specific
design activities to evaluation procedures and tools that will help the
novice (as well as experienced) evaluator plan, conduct, and report
better evaluations. Many of the tools can be used for multiple
functions. A Web site associated with this book (http://www.evaluateitnow.com) provides downloadable tools and other links related to evaluation.
The
book is already being used as a textbook in evaluation courses in the
USA, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere. We have had offers to translate
it into languages other than English, a task that we hope to pursue
soon. We think that people in business and industrial training will
find much of value in this book as well as anyone doing instructional
design and development in academe. Distance or flexible learning
managers should find useful guidance for contracting external
evaluators in this book. We don’t have any notions of making any
serious profit from this book, but we sincerely (and humbly) hope to
improve the quality of evaluations wherever online learning is
developed or used.
Dr. Saba: What are some of the highlights of the book? What will the reader learn from the book?
Dr. Reeves: The
first chapter of the book introduces our rationale for evaluation…to
inform decision-making at all stages of instructional product
development.
Chapter Two clarifies the evaluation process by
describing its theoretical roots and providing an overview of its
historical development.
The third chapter links the roles that evaluation can play with each stage of the interactive product development process.
Chapter Four is all about planning and managing evaluations.
Chapter
Five — review — describes the first stage in our six stage model.
Review helps refine the rationale for why an interactive product should
be produced in the first place.
Chapter Six describes needs
assessment, a process that helps clarify the project objectives and
design parameters that guide the instructional development process.
Chapter
Seven focuses on formative evaluation — evaluation intended to enhance
a product as it is being developed. We pay a lot of attention to
usability or the cognitive demands of the product interface.
Chapter
Eight deals with effectiveness evaluation, including strategies for
evaluating the interactive learning system in action to determine how
it is working in the intended context.
Chapter Nine is all
about impact evaluation. This function examines the integration of an
interactive learning system within an organization’s structure and
reveals how a product supports the organization’s goals.
Chapter Ten covers maintenance evaluation, a neglected area which should be a critical part of any product’s renewal cycle.
Chapter Eleven focuses on several issues about how evaluation studies should be reported to clients and other stakeholders.
Finally,
Chapter Twelve seeks to explore how evaluators might contribute to the
overall advancement of interactive learning systems design in
substantial ways beyond the immediate context of any given project.
Each
chapter includes a comprehensive list of references, and there are many
tools and links to external resources embedded in the pages.
Dr. Saba: Are there major differences in evaluating online learners and those who are present in a classroom?
Dr. Reeves: Evaluating
online learning has both advantages and disadvantages over evaluating
traditional classroom instruction. But first, let me clarify how we use
the terms assessment and evaluation in this book. The terms evaluation
and assessment are often used synonymously, but this leads to a great
deal of confusion. Therefore, we use these terms to mean two very
different things. Both evaluation and assessment involve the collection
of information to make decisions. However, evaluation is focused on
things, e.g., programs, products, and projects. Assessment is focused
on people, e.g., their aptitudes, attitudes, or achievement. In short,
we assess people (e.g., their attitudes, aptitudes, achievements,
etc.), and we evaluate programs and products (e.g., their
effectiveness, impact, etc.). Our book is primarily about evaluation,
but assessment is an activity often used within an evaluation.
Within
the context of online learning, a great deal of the data collection
required for both assessment and evaluation can be automated. You can
record learner paths through an interactive program, their choices
among any options presented, their quiz and test scores, etc. Most
learning management systems (LMS) include audit trail functions, and
you can even make your online data collection proactive by displaying
questions on the screen that inquire about the learner’s reactions to
various aspects of the online learning program at pre-specified
intervals or points.
That said, the analysis of audit trail
data within complex interactive programs is challenging, and may
sometimes require more inference than in classroom observations. When
learners can go wherever they want in any sequence, detecting
interpretable paths without any direct interpretation from the learners
is highly inferential. This problem is even more complex when the World
Wide Web is used for the delivery of interactive learning. It is
technically quite easy to track wherever a user goes on the Web.
However, the interpretation of such data involves a great deal of
subjectivity. If data collection is not carefully planned and managed,
the evaluator can drown in data from which it is difficult to extract
meaningful information to guide decision-making.
Dr. Saba: Who is the publisher and where can we get more information about this book?
Dr. Reeves: The
publisher is Larry Lipsitz and his associates at Educational Technology
Publications, Inc. John and I appreciate Larry’s investment in making
our book available. You can find out more about ordering the book at
their Website at: http://bookstoread.com/etp /. A pdf flyer about the book can be downloaded at: http://bookstoread.com/etp/interactive.pdf, and the official support site for the book is: http://www.evaluateitnow.com.

Dr.Thomas
C. Reeves is professor of instructional technology at The University of
Georgia where he teaches program evaluation, multimedia design, and
research courses. Since receiving his Ph.D. at Syracuse University in
1979, he has developed and evaluated numerous interactive multimedia
programs for both education and training. In addition to numerous
presentations and workshops in the USA, he has been an invited speaker
in other countries including Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada,
China, England, Finland, Malaysia, New Zealand, Peru, Portugal, Russia,
Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, and Taiwan. He is a past
president of the Association for the Development of Computer-based
Instructional Systems (ADCIS) and a former Fulbright Lecturer. In 1995,
he was selected as one of the “Top 100” people in multimedia by
Multimedia Producer magazine, and from 1997 - 2000, he was the editor
of the Journal of Interactive Learning Research. In 2003, he was the
first person to receive the AACE Fellowship Award from the Association
for the Advancement of Computing in Education.